What Gall: Corrupt Democratic Party Hacks Lecture Bernie On Responsibility

“Boy, talk about killing the messenger.”

By Mark L. Taylor
The Daily Call (4/19/16)

So now we have state Democratic party apparatchiks around the country lecturing Bernie Sanders for pointing out the corruption of the cozy joint financing Hillary Victory Fund arrangements enriching 32 state parties and the Clinton machine. Under this scheme wealthy individuals can push spending limits to the wall and some of it sloshes back to the state parties while most of it goes to enriching the Clinton coffers. The Democratic Party of Wisconsin is one of the corrupt 32.

Read the Huffington Post story below carefully.

We are told these kind of shadowy big money operations are essential “standard procedure” to running modern campaigns. Maybe so, but look at the current state of our money-driven campaigns and the corrupt government those campaigns deliver. A bought-and-sold campaign leads to a bought-and-sold government which leads to suffering which leads to dangerous demagogues like Donald Trump.

Waiting, Waiting, Waiting …

Scan 15

For Democratic Party officials to get a clue.


State party toadies moan that they need Clinton’s lucre because their efforts “don’t tend to generate small-donor enthusiasm like the Sanders’ campaign.” Hmm, have they even considered following Sanders’ path to talk seriously about the issues Bernie has raised and find candidates who will speak out for and then actually fight for what American workers and families need? Send me yet another glossy fundraising brochure from some overpaid political consulting gang for a politician like Rep. Ron Kind and I guarantee you the DPW isn’t getting another penny from me. (Check out Kind’s primary challenger Myron Buchholz, HERE.)

Yo-hoo, Dem potentates: Bernie has raised millions with an average donation of $27 from people who you should be representing. Many of those donations have come from independent voters, the very people the party needs to bring into the fold if the party wants to be relevant and win. Instead of leaning on the rotted staff of the inbred wealthy and disease-ridden crutch of corporations the party needs to build an alliance with working people. The kind of alliance that built the party in the past.

We hear moaning and groaning that Bernie’s call for honest financing will “turn his supporters against the Democratic Party.” Boy, talk about killing the messenger! Here’s the message for Democratic Party officials to hear:

“We know you abandoned working families 30 years ago and we are sick and tired of it. You talk about representing us then help the Republicans do their dirty business of siphoning our pockets and delivering our nation into the paws of Wall Street. We see — and reject — your corruption.”

Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook got all huffy, lecturing Bernie that, “Instead of trying to convince the next generation of progressives that the Democratic Party is corrupt, Senator Sanders should stick to the issues and think about what he can do to help the Party he is seeking to lead.”

This from the spokesdrone of the candidate who has received millions from Wall Street banksters, hedgefunders, fraudsters, Walmart, oil industry execs and other corporate criminals while refusing to disclose the transcripts of the Wall Street bankster speeches for which she received millions of dollars. The big money corruption of the Democratic party is the issue, Robby.

No, Robby, it is your cynical candidate, party hacks and corporate toadies like Ron Kind who have convinced us that the Democratic Party is twisted with dark big money corruption.

Grab a muck rake and read on…


Democrats Fear Bernie Sanders Is Turning Voters Against Them

By Samantha Lachman
Huffington Post (4/19/16)

WASHINGTON — State Democratic parties are ticked off that Bernie Sanders is characterizing fundraising arrangements they have with Hillary Clinton’s campaign as corrupt.

A joint fundraising committee set up by Clinton’s campaign, the Democratic National Committee and 32 state Democratic parties is essential to the survival of state party organizations, said state leaders, including some who said Sanders’ complaints may be poisoning his supporters against Democrats.

Sanders’ campaign on Monday sent an open letter to the Democratic National Committee “to convey some extremely serious concerns” about the joint fundraising committee. The letter alleged the committee may have committed “serious apparent violations” of campaign finance laws by over-reimbursing the Clinton campaign.

The committee, called the Hillary Victory Fund, can accept checks over $350,000 from individual donors; it raised $33 million in the first three months of 2016. Campaign finance experts have largely dismissed Sanders’ allegations, calling them “sour grapes,” and “less about legality and more about feeding into the Sanders’ campaign theme that Hillary Clinton is corrupt in her campaign finance dealings.” One expert told Think Progress that the fundraising committee appears “permissible but … offensive.”

The Sanders campaign told The Washington Post it directed its letter to the DNC, rather than the Federal Election Commission, which would ostensibly investigate such claims, “as a first step.”

Democratic organizations in Ohio and Virginia quickly weighed in on the spat, emphasizing that their fundraising agreements with the DNC and Clinton’s campaign provide vital financial support, since their activities don’t tend to generate small-donor enthusiasm like Sanders’ campaign.

Raymond Buckley, chair of New Hampshire’s Democratic Party,posted on Facebook that the joint fundraising committee “should not be used as a political football.”

State parties said joint fundraising agreements like the one Clinton’s campaign has with the DNC help them because the mega-donors Clinton’s campaign can draw are, as Buckley put it, “out of reach of the average state party.”

“Based upon past interviews and this new situation, I’ve become skeptical of Sen. Sanders’ willingness to invest in building the infrastructure that is needed to win down-ballot races,” Rick Palacio, chair of the Colorado Democratic Party, told The Huffington Post.

Palacio said the joint fundraising agreements have allowed his state party to hire organizers and staffers for voter registration and other outreach programs.

“Politics is a team sport and Democratic politics needs to be more of a team right now than ever before, considering we have a minority in both the U.S. House and the Senate and all these legislatures around the country,” Palacio said.

Democrats have complained that while Sanders has his own joint fundraising agreement with the DNC, he hasn’t used it, even though the “political revolution” he advocates could only happen if more Democrats were elected to state legislatures and Congress.

“We know all too well just having the White House isn’t enough to affect all of the change we need, especially here in Michigan, where the Republican Party holds unchecked power at the state level,” said Paul Kanan, the Michigan’s Democratic Party’s press secretary.

Some state party officials told HuffPost they fear Sanders’ supporters won’t be interested in voting for down-ballot Democratic candidates in November if he tarnishes their reputations.

“The victory fund arrangement is all standard procedure for modern campaigns — Bernie could (and should) be doing this too if he wants to lead Democrats to victory this year,” a spokesman for a battleground state Democratic Party told HuffPost. He asked for anonymity to speak frankly about Sanders’ allegations against Clinton’s campaign and the DNC. “The tone of these attacks is troubling for us long-term because he’s using his bully pulpit to turn his supporters against the Democratic Party.”

Both presidential campaigns have tried to capitalize on the scuffle. The Sanders campaign made a fundraising appeal off its letter to the DNC 26 minutes after making the accusations. Clinton’s campaign fired back with two separate fundraising emails, calling the claims “irresponsible and poisonous” and “completely false.”

Clinton’s campaign, which frequently highlights the work of state and local Democrats, suggested the dispute over how the funds for the committee are distributed reflects Sanders’ lack of interest in being the leader of the party. Sanders has said he decided to run as a Democrat to receive media coverage. He did send fundraising emails for three Democratic congressional candidates he has endorsed last week.

“Instead of trying to convince the next generation of progressives that the Democratic Party is corrupt, Senator Sanders should stick to the issues and think about what he can do to help the Party he is seeking to lead,” Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook said in a statement.

Link to Story

This entry was posted in Newsletter and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.